First Arriving Network
Powered by the First Arriving Network, Reaching 1M+ First Responders Worldwide

Inside the arson ring: A must read. Police report indicates young Massachusetts firefighters were bored & greedy.

There is now a lot more detail about the five on-call firefighters accused of starting fires in three vacant homes in the Massachusetts towns of Brimfield and Holland. It probably won’t surprise anyone familiar with the issue of firefighter arson that these were young men who said they set the fires because they were bored. They weren’t seeing enough action, except the EMS calls that really didn’t interest them.

In this case there is also the issue of greed. They were on-call firefighters who needed the money from the fire responses. The firefighters charged are Patrick K. Elliott, 19, a call firefighter with the Brimfield Fire Department, Brian S. Findlay, 18, a call firefighter with the Brimfield and Holland fire departments, Jordan R. Frank, 18, a call firefighter with the Brimfield Fire Department, Dylan J. Lajeunesse, 18,a call firefighter with the Holland Fire Department and Donald C. Moores, 20, a call firefighter with the Brimfield and Holland fire departments.

In an excellent article by Gerard F. Russell and Kim Ring at, the reporters go through the police report showing how the five firefighters set the fires and how they were caught. The story indicates investigators focused on the firefighters following a call to a tip line. The caller said one of the firefighters told a friend he and other firefighters had set the fires.

A couple of other interesting points from the excerpts below. The firefighters weren’t very good at starting fires, needing to go back and get gasoline in order to get two of the fires going. 

Note the evidence the investigators now have thanks to the young firefighters texting each other with details about what they were doing. Not long before I became a volunteer in the 1970s a couple of firefighter arsonists were arrested from the company I joined. Of course there was no texting in those days. I was told what helped catch the pair was they were on an alternate fire department radio channel when one asked the other if they removed the gasoline can.

Here are some of the details from Massachusetts firefighter arson ring:

The police report detailed the men’s alleged activities leading up to each fire, which included text messages in which the men talked about their involvement in the fires. The police narrative details episodes of failed attempts to light fires with a mixture of oil and diesel fuel in plastic containers that was mixed at the Brimfield Fire Department by Mr. Elliott.

Some of the men allegedly hung out together at the Brimfield fire headquarters, became bored and rode around the town looking for abandoned homes to burn. Prior to one of the fires, Mr. Frank told police that Mr. Elliott “made a mixture of oil, and either gas, diesel or kerosene” and put it into a large antifreeze container. Mr. Elliott “had the container with the mixture between his legs in the front passenger seat.”

After pouring the mixture all over the garage door at the Chandler Road fire, Mr. Elliott tried lighting the accelerant but “it flashed and went down.” The men left and went back to the Brimfield fire station. Mr. Frank said Mr. Elliott “was freaking out because his prints were everywhere.” So the men drove back and the fire was smoldering. They then went to the home of one of the men to wait for the fire call tones that sound to alert firefighters to respond to fires.

After the first fire during the cleanup, Mr. Moores had asked Mr. Frank, of West Brookfield, how he arrived at the fire so fast. Mr. Frank said he was in the area with Mr. Elliott, Mr. Patrick and Mr. Findlay. In a police interview, Mr. Moores said he asked the men if they started the fire and they denied it.

“Moores stated he has known these guys a long time and he knew they were lying about the fire so he asked a second time and they all laughed and Elliott stated they did start it,” the report said.

Hours before the second fire on Washington Road, Mr. Elliott allegedly telephoned Mr. Moores, who was visiting another firefighter in town. Mr. Moores was preparing to go home Mr. Elliott told him to “just stay in town.”

Mr. Moores asked Mr. Elliott, “Why, are you going to start another fire?” Mr. Elliott did not answer the question. Just before midnight, Mr. Moores spotted Mr. Elliott, Mr. Frank and Mr. Findlay at Cumberland Farms, and Mr. Moores again asked Mr. Elliott why he should stay in town. Mr. Elliott responded, “You know why.”

All of the men then drove to the Brimfield fire station, where an accelerant was mixed inside the bay where the ambulance and forestry trucks were parked.

Mr. Moores told police that before the third fire, in Holland, he received a text message to meet Mr. Elliott, Mr. Findlay, Mr. Frank and Mr. Lajeunesse to start another fire.

As in a previous fire, the men had trouble getting the fire going. Around 1:30 a.m., Mr. Findlay got a text message saying the fire did not light.

As a result, Mr. Elliott and Mr. Frank returned to the fire department to get more gasoline and then went back to the Chandler Road home to relight it.

The police report said it was Mr. Elliott and Mr. Findlay who were bored and wanted to start the fires. In his interview with police, Mr. Lajeunesse said that “the reason for the fires was to look cool and go to fires.”

He added, “They didn’t want to go to medicals — as it is not what they look forward to. Lajeunesse stated that he joined the department to fight fires.”

Comments - Add Yours

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Inside the arson ring: A must read. Police report indicates young Massachusetts firefighters were bored & greedy. | --

  • Spencer

    The media should do us all a favor (those of us on the job) and quit callin these scum bags “Firefighters”. Where I come from, that is a title that has to be earned and is not for some twit firebugs. Firemen put out fires, we dont start them.

    Be safe,
    S.E. “No. 1 Statter fan from Virginia” Nolen, Sr.

  • Rambo

    Hey Spencer I agree 100%.

  • Anonymous

    There seem to be more and more of these “firefighter” arsons. There should be a law – be it state or federal – that treats such crimes more severly than those caused by civilian arsonists. Not only do they endanger lives and destroy property, they also scar a proud and noble tradition. Hand ‘em all, I say (from a burning tree, perhaps)!

  • Anonymous

    These boys are not firefighters since firefighting is not their primary jobs. There are many fine young men who will make excellent firefighters one day. These five should not be lumped into that category of dedicated firefighters.

  • uk-fb-buff

    My 2 cents from Calif.

    1st. Good newspaper article and liked the comments from the residents.

    2nd. I agree being released on a $250.00 dollar bond is too little for the crimes they committed or attempted to.

    3rd. They should be prosecuted fully. Arson is a crime and they basically looked to set the fires during the early morning hours to delay discovery.

    4th. They should be made to pay “Cost Recovery” for the damages they caused. Don’t just let the insurance company pay for it totally. Rather, the insurance company pays the claim, and the they seek restitution from the Call personnel in civil court.

    In similiar stories, you had the recent conviction of a volunteer firefighter in New York State (?) for starting a fire
    that resulted in several civilian deaths and sent to State prison.

    And here in California, for leaving an unattended camp fire that eventually burned through the coastal community of Malibu, the person responsbile were heavily fined and sentenced to some jail time.

    FYI, Arson in a Calif. State Forested Area, will bring a person State Prison time and a lawsuit to seek “Cost Recovery” for the entire incident. That means, State, Federal, Local Agency, Contract providers and so on for every thing and everyone used on the incident or used to back fill the incident.

    Case in point, the 2009 “Station Fire” in Los Angeles County. The person/s who started the fire, if ever found will be paying Millions of Dollars for this fire.

  • Pingback: Fire Fighter Rings

  • Halligan

    The high school i attend Tantasqua Regional High School is the school these 5 boy attended and one still does. It has been non-stop talk of the school and the many members of both Holland and Brimfield FDs. Going through school i quickly learnt these kids had a reputation of being complete idiots and it goes to show that they lived up to their reputations. Its sad the name these boys have giving these FDs in particular and the fire service, a good chunk of the guys on the job in those depts. are great kids who do their best and want to get onto a larger dept. when they grow up. I agree with spencer stop calling them “firefighters” they arent they are complete scum “i was bored” yeah i was too today, didnt start any fire though, maybe theres something wrong with me.

  • anonymous

    There seem to be more and more of these “firefighter” arsons. There should be a law – be it state or federal – that treats such crimes more severly than those caused by civilian arsonists. Not only do they endanger lives and destroy property, they also scar a proud and noble tradition. Hand ‘em all, I say (from a burning tree, perhaps)!

    on September 4, 2010 @ 9:34 pm.

    to the above, I agree that a hanging would be a suitable punishment, but not from a burning tree……it might burn through the rope. there’s always going old school, really old school and burning them at the stake…..